Post-retirement Business Venture and Social Security - Melvin
Logo 801-746-5075
9571 South 700 East, Suite 104 Sandy, , UT 84070
Call: 801-746-5075

Post-retirement Business Venture and Social Security

by Melvin Cook

RECENT POSTS
  • Case Management Conferences in Domestic Relations Cases

    Case Management Conferences in Domestic Relations Cases  Read more...

  • BIFF Your Way to Successful Communications with Your Ex-Spouse

    BIFF Your Way to Successful Communications with Your Ex-Spouse  Read more...

R was a partner with P in a business venture in which they owned and operated a motel. R applied for social security retirement benefits in May 1961.

In that same month he allegedly leased his business interest to his son, S. S did not manage or operate the business, however, and he maintained a full-time job apart from the business. In September 1961 S enrolled in dental school.

P continued to consult with R about business matters. R continued to spend a significant amount of time at the motel. He spent 8 hours at the motel every other day of the week. By contrast, P did not consult with S about the business. When S came home for the summer, he went back to his full-time job and took no part in running the motel.

Under social security regulations, in determining whether a self-employed person’s services were substantial for purposes of imposing work deductions against their benefits, some of the factors to be considered were: 1) the amount of time the person spent in the trade or business; 2) the nature of the services performed by the person; 3) the nature of the person’s activities before drawing benefits versus after; 4) the presence or absence of a paid manager, partner or family member to manage the business; 5) the type of business that is involved; and 6) the amount of capital invested in the trade or business.

It is not illegal or improper to terminate a business or to rearrange one’s business affairs in order to qualify for benefits. But such transactions or arrangements must be bona fide, and social security may look beyond the form to the substance or the transaction.

In the instant case it appeared R was still performing substantial services for the partnership and his distributive share was counted for imposing work deductions, since he was under age 72.

See Social Security Ruling (SSR) 65-6.

This material should not be construed as legal advice for any particular fact situation, but is intended for general informational purposes only. For advice specific to any individual situation, an experienced attorney should be contacted

Contact a Salt Lake City Attorney Committed to Protecting Your Rights

When it comes the family law and social security disability, each client and case is different. It is also important to select an attorney with the experience, skills and professionalism required to address your legal issues. To learn more, contact the Salt Lake City law offices of Melvin A. Cook and schedule an initial consultation to discuss your case.

    * fields are required