Residual Functional Capacity in Social Security Disability and SSI Cases
An important element of any disability claim to the residual functional capacity social security disability case in Utah. Contact Law Office of Mel A. Cook.
Logo 801-746-5075
9571 South 700 East, Suite 104 Sandy, , UT 84070
Call: 801-746-5075

Residual Functional Capacity in Social Security Disability and SSI Cases

by Melvin Cook

RECENT POSTS
  • Electoral College must follow Voters' preference

    Electoral College must follow Voters’ preference  Read more...

  • The U.S. Supreme Court Keeps DACA Alive, for Now

    The U.S. Supreme Court Keeps DACA Alive, for Now  Read more...

One of the most important considerations in any Social Security Disability or SSI claim is the claimant’s residual functional capacity, or “RFC.” It is appropriate to consider the RFC as the claimant’s functional limitations or restrictions; or in other words, the maximum amount of work-like activities the person can do on a sustained basis.

So, for example, a person might be limited to standing and walking for a total of only two hours in an eight hour work day given their pain or related symptoms from a medical condition such as a painful back or leg injury. Or, the person may be limited in using their hands because of pain or related symptoms from carpal tunnel syndrome or arthritis.

The RFC will take into account the person’s exertional and non-exertional limitations. Exertional limitations are those that affect a person’s ability to meet the strength demands of a job. These strength demands fall into the seven basic categories of sitting, standing, walking, pushing, pulling, lifting and carrying. Non-exertional limitations are those that affect a person’s ability to do the demands of a job other than strength demands. These may be things like difficulty concentrating on a task or following detailed instructions, difficulty seeing or hearing, or manipulative or postural limitations to name a few. A person may have a combination of both exertional and non-exertional limitations.

Typically, the most qualified person(s) to assess an individual’s RFC is the claimant’s treating physician(s) who has been treating them for a long time. This is because a treating doctor presumably knows the claimant’s medical conditions better than anyone else. Acceptable treating source opinions are typically given significant weight by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) if they are consistent with the other medical evidence as a whole. In some instances, such treating source opinions may be given controlling weight.

The main point of this post is to emphasize that treating source opinions from a disability claimants’ doctors regarding their functional limitations (RFC) are a very important element of any disability claim.

This material should not be construed as legal advice for any particular fact situation, but is intended for general informational purposes only. For advice specific to any individual situation, an experienced attorney should be contacted.

Contact a Salt Lake City Attorney Committed to Protecting Your Rights

When it comes the family law and social security disability, each client and case is different. It is also important to select an attorney with the experience, skills and professionalism required to address your legal issues. To learn more, contact the Salt Lake City law offices of Melvin A. Cook and schedule an initial consultation to discuss your case.

* fields are required